Patent intelligence · EU-domiciled

Patent intelligence,source-traced.

Drop a patent. Get a litigation-grade report with cited prior art in under an hour. No black boxes — every claim independently verified by two language models.

Try the playground
GDPR-compliantEU-domiciled · Floor No. 8 SRL
patentis.eu / cases / insulin-co-formulation-fto
Cases / Wearable infusion — freedom-to-operate

Insulin-glucagon co-formulation — freedom-to-operate

FTOUS 11,402,889 B2·Beta BioTech SA·142 prior art refs
Claim element ↓ / Prior art →
US 11,623,990Beta BionicsOpus
WO 2020/089221Zealand PharmaGemini
US 10,991,124Insulet Corp.Opus
EP 3 401 772MedtronicGemini
Claim 1A dual-hormone closed-loop infusion administering insulin and glucagon to a wearer based on CGM trends…
89% overlap
52% partial
84% overlap
71% conflict
Claim 9wherein the predictive bolus coefficient is updated within 300 ms of receiving a CGM sample…
47% partial
86% overlap
61% partial
Claim 22the wearable reservoir further comprising a micro-pressure sensor array on the catheter interface…
91% overlap
54% partial
79% overlap
Routed via Claude Opus 4.7+Gemini 2.5 Pro·142 references · 8 cross-cited · 3 watchlist flagsQuorum verified · κ 0.88

FTO element map from the Patentis methodology pack — 142 references with conflict surfacing before your engineers commit to the pump UI.

Three workflows · one platform

Built for the work, not the demo.

Patent attorneys spend more time chasing references than reading them. Patentis flips the ratio.

Invalidity

Demolish patents systematically.

Surface every relevant prior art across 50M+ patents and 250M scientific papers. Strength-rated, source-cited, exportable straight into claim charts. The work the Federal Circuit asks for, completed before lunch.

SOURCE-TRACEDTry
FTO

Ship without infringing.

Map your products against patent claims, element by element. Get confidence scores and risk reasons per claim element — so your engineers know exactly what to design around and your counsel knows where the real exposure lives.

SOURCE-TRACEDTry
Competitive

Know what your competitors hold.

Discover overlapping products, monitor competitor filings, track portfolio strength over time. Watch the landscape shift and get notified the moment a rival files in your domain.

SOURCE-TRACEDTry
Four reasons we win

What an honest patent tool looks like.

Four commitments, audited continuously. We'd rather lose a deal than misrepresent how we work.

M

Open methodology

We publish every prompt, evaluation harness, and benchmark we use. No black boxes. Audit our routing logic on GitHub.

Read methodology
Q

Multi-vendor LLM quorum

Claude Opus 4.7, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Pool Laguna XS.2, Codex Tools — every finding cross-checked across vendors. Disagreements surface, never hide.

See vendor matrix
S

Source-traced

Every output cites primary sources — patent numbers, paragraph references, page numbers. Exportable to Word with citations intact.

See sample export
E

EU-domiciled

Floor No. 8 SRL · București · Romania. GDPR + EU AI Act compliant by design. Your data stays in the EU; subprocessors fully disclosed.

Subprocessor list
How we compare

Three approaches. One sober choice.

The market splits between legacy databases that miss things and closed AI tools that hide how they work. We sit deliberately between.

PatentisEU

Starting at$99 / mo · self-serve
  • Public demo with real results, no signup
  • Open methodology — prompts + benchmarks published
  • Multi-vendor LLM quorum (Claude + Gemini + Pool + Codex)
  • Source-traced — every output cites primary sources
  • Self-serve $99 · Team $499 · Enterprise custom
  • EU-domiciled · GDPR + EU AI Act by design

StiltaSE

Estimated$500–5,000 / seat · enterprise only
  • No public demo — auth-walled fully
  • Closed methodology — not published
  • Single LLM (Anthropic-locked)
  • Source-traced outputs
  • Enterprise-only pricing model
  • EU-domiciled (Stockholm)

TraditionalPatsnap · LexisNexis

From$5,000+ / yr · annual contract
  • No AI agents — keyword + boolean search
  • Methodology proprietary, not auditable
  • No LLM cross-check or quorum verification
  • Source-traced (manual citation)
  • Time-intensive · 40+ hours per invalidity case
  • US-domiciled · GDPR via DPA
Pricing

Pay for the work, not the seat count.

One month, monthly. Cancel anytime. Enterprise tier is the only one that requires a conversation.

Tier I

Self-Serve

$99/mo

For solo patent attorneys, R&D engineers, and curious researchers. Personal use.

  • 50 queries per month
  • Full claim chart export
  • All 4 LLM vendors
  • Email support · 48h SLA
  • 1-month case history retained
Start trial · 7 days free
Tier III

Enterprise

Custom

For multinational law firms, corporate IP departments, and sovereign clients. Talk to us.

  • SSO / SAML / SCIM
  • Dedicated customer engineer
  • Custom corpus integration
  • On-premise deployment option
  • Custom DPA + data-residency selection
  • Audit logs · long-term retention
Talk to founders

Trusted by attorneys at —

From the methodology

How we score.

Every finding is independently retrieved by two language models. Where they agree, the result enters the report with a high quorum coefficient. Where they disagree, we surface the disagreement — we never silently break ties.

Each cited reference includes its exact paragraph or column-line citation, exportable to Word with hyperlinks intact. We benchmark our retrieval against the EPO Boards of Appeal corpus quarterly; the results are published with timestamped commits.

We do not hide which model wrote which passage. Our routing logic is on GitHub. The prompts are auditable. The quorum thresholds are configurable per tenant. Our subprocessors are listed by name and EU residency status — and updated within five business days of any change.

Read the methodology in full — prompts, evaluation harnesses, and quarterly benchmarks at patentis.floorno8.com/methodology.

Last updated · Methodology v2.4 · May 2026Read in full